SpyderByte.com ;Technical Portals 
      
 News & Information Related to Linux High Performance Computing, Linux Clustering and Cloud Computing
Home About News Archives Contribute News, Articles, Press Releases Mobile Edition Contact Advertising/Sponsorship Search Privacy
HPC Vendors
Cluster Quoter (HPC Cluster RFQ)
Hardware Vendors
Software Vendors
HPC Consultants
Training Vendors
HPC Resources
Featured Articles
Cluster Builder
Beginners
Whitepapers
Documentation
Software
Lists/Newsgroups
Books
User Groups & Organizations
HP Server Diagrams
HPC News
Latest News
Newsletter
News Archives
Search Archives
HPC Links
ClusterMonkey.net
Scalability.org
HPCCommunity.org

Beowulf.org
HPC Tech Forum (was BW-BUG)
Gelato.org
The Aggregate
Top500.org
Cluster Computing Info Centre
Coyote Gultch
Dr. Robert Brown's Beowulf Page
FreshMeat.net: HPC Software
SuperComputingOnline
HPC User Forum
GridsWatch
HPC Newsletters
Stay current on Linux HPC news, events and information.
LinuxHPC.org Newsletter

Other Mailing Lists:
Linux High Availability
Beowulf Mailing List
Gelato.org (Linux Itanium)

LinuxHPC.org
Home
About
Contact
Mobile Edition
Sponsorship

Latest News

Cluster and Grid Computing Flying Blind
Posted by Philip Carinhas, Sunday March 12 2006 @ 11:46PM EST

Cluster and grid computing has become extremely popular, yet very few designers are using modern capacity planning techniques to ensure performance.

Cooking on the Grid

Grid computing has become extremely popular in IT circles mainly because of the potential computing power and cost savings. But grid computing is a multifaceted technology that means different things to different people. Some interpret grids to be a heterogeneous group of desktops and servers, which other see it as a group of cluster computers connected together over the internet. Sometimes grids are designed for raw CPU power, others are designed for raw I/O, while others are a combination of data and compute power. Many grids are often designed around a specific set of applications. As we'll see later, this is why grid and cluster design is strongly tied to its intended purpose.

Grid Lock

Yet despite the importance of strategic design of grids and clusters, very few commercial integrators spend the time or capital to ensure the system's feasibility and performance. The reason why is many fold; lack of experience, cost issues, ego, or lack of skill resources. An important exception to this is the scientific community whose grids and clusters are often well designed.

A Stitch in Design Saves Nine

So what is really involved in cluster/grid design and planning? First of all, not every application is suited for a cluster and/or grid environment. Customers who switch from an SMP environment to clusters with the intension to someday get into the intra-grid domain are supposed to conduct a feasibility study prior to getting too deep into the cluster business.

Second, the customer has to fully understand the current workload behavior, and has to be able to formulate the goals that have to be achieved in a cluster/grid environment. Modeling based sensitivity studies allow the customer to compare (from a relative perspective) design alternatives, and to zoom in on the setup that is most feasible for the environment. As a modeling based approach is recommended at this stage, no money has to be spend yet on any hardware components. In a nutshell, conducting a comprehensive feasibility and design study early on in any cluster/grid project safes the customer substantial money, and replaces the common guessing game with a very pragmatic approach to systems engineering that leads to stable environment with a high acceptance rate from the user community.

Conclusion

Grid/intra-grid/cluster planning and design studies are fundmental parts of the implementation process, having the greatest impact when designed into the final project, encompassing application (workload), network/interconnects, OS, I0, memory, and CPU subsystems, respectively. In almost all circumstances, companies can recoup the design costs in the long run, as fewer firefighting nightmares are necessary.

About Fortuitous

Fortuitous Technologies provides comprehensive performance, planning, and design services based on solid mathematical and statistical methods. They can be contacted at http://Fortuitous.com .


< ASPEED Software Takes ACCELLERANT on the Road | Wombat and Voltaire Pioneer Market Data over Inf >

 

Affiliates

Cluster Monkey

HPC Community


Supercomputing 2010

- Supercomputing 2010 website...

- 2010 Beowulf Bash

- SC10 hits YouTube!

- Louisiana Governor Jindal Proclaims the week of November 14th "Supercomputing Week" in honor of SC10!








Appro: High Performance Computing Resources
IDC: Appro Xtreme-X Supercomputer Blade Solution
Analysis of the Xtreme-X architecture and management system while assessing challenges and opportunities in the technical computing market for blade servers.

Video - The Road to PetaFlop Computing
Explore the Scalable Unit concept where multiple clusters of various sizes can be rapidly built and deployed into production. This new architectural approach yields many subtle benefits to dramatically lower total cost of ownership.
White Paper - Optimized HPC Performance
Multi-core processors provide a unique set of challenges and opportunities for the HPC market. Discover MPI strategies for the Next-Generation Quad-Core Processors.

Appro and the Three National Laboratories
[Appro delivers a new breed of highly scalable, dynamic, reliable and effective Linux clusters to create the next generation of supercomputers for the National Laboratories.

AMD Opteron-based products | Intel Xeon-based products



Home About News Archives Contribute News, Articles, Press Releases Mobile Edition Contact Advertising/Sponsorship Search Privacy
     Copyright © 2001-2013 LinuxHPC.org
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds
All other trademarks are those of their owners.
    
  SpyderByte.com ;Technical Portals